Posts tagged as:

Marketing

Take back the tour

"Screw the dopers, politics and critics."

That’s the first line of Versus’s new ad campaign to get attention back on the Tour de France. A slate of TV ads coincide with the launch of a new site called, Take Back The Tour.

“Join the Movement” is a great call-to-action. The link takes you into the site, where everything has a tone of defiance. A link in the top right asks, “How will you take back the tour” giving fans the chance to express their ideas and even to vent a little.

In a time when every sport seems to be dogged by allegations of juiced athletes, this is exactly tone Versus should be taking. It makes them appear to be as frustrated as we, the sports fans, are. It gives the appearance that they are fighting for the soul of the sport. Other sports outlets, such as Major League Baseball, are getting caught up in PR-speak and weak responses. They should take a page from the Versus play book and fight back. Show the fans you believe in your sport.

{ 1 comment }

Search is the most powerful way to drive traffic to sites, outshining email, banners, and other forms of online advertising. Search is also effective at driving foot traffic to brick & mortar stores. Many people conduct research online—starting at a search engine—for a product they would rather buy, or end up buying, in-store. But there is more to connecting the two beyond just providing your street address to
online customers.

I developed a process that I call the Search-to-Store Experience. It is a process that enables a consumers that enters the buying funnel at a search engines to easily complete the process in a brick and mortar store. (The issue of tracking that process from start-to-finish via metrics to determine ROI is also important. Maybe I’ll discuss that side in later posts.)

The focus of the Search-to-Store Experience is to connect the two channels more seamlessly and in a way that feels natural to a searcher. It is most valuable to the consumer that begins by conducting a search then switches channels to complete the sale in store. The entire process has to feel like a natural progression to the consumer.

Here are some tips in creating your own Search-to-Store Experience.

Make Usual connections between channels.
Investing in a SEM campaign to help sell blue widgets? Then have a blue widget display near the front entrance of the store. When the person that started with an online search walks in, they make the instant "there it is" connection. They’ll put the blue widget right in their basket.

Contextualize messaging.
As the consumer moves along the search channel (from search, to PPC ad or organic listing, to a landing page) the messaging needs to mature with that progression. Don’t repeat the same thing at each step, but rather go a level deeper. Reinforce, but open the messaging to more detail or product features. The landing page not only needs to have a picture of the product but a full description, the stores that are near them, and
a printable coupon to redeem in store.

Uniform branding.
Brand messaging can easily change as it is applied in different marketing channels. Messaging in print ads need to match messaging on a web site. But importantly, messaging carried out in a search engine, either via PPC ad copy or meta descriptions in organic listings, needs to also match your brand messaging. The continuity of brand messaging is key is the different channels feeling unified to the consumer.

Connect other business areas.
If other areas of your business are connected, regardless of channel, a consumer will use the channel most convenient for them at the time. Using different doorways to your brand will feel natural. And if the
branding is uniform, the consumer won’t feel lost. Allowing online purchased to be returned in-store, loyalty programs and promotions to be redeemed in-store, online or over the phone. This makes any channel
switches your consumers make feel like a comfortable part of doing business with your brand.

{ 0 comments }

A few days ago my friend sent me an IM asking me if I knew where he could buy a bag of salt for his driveway. Here in the mid-west, Old Man Winter isn’t quite done with us yet. Being a search fanatic, I quickly consulted Google by typing in "Snow Salt."

I found these two pay-per-click ads:

Shopping.com PPC Ad

Target PPC Ad

What exactly, are they trying to sell me? It’s certainly not snow salt.

Whenever a pay-per-click ads messaging does not match consumer expectation, it creates a disconnect that can damage a brand’s reputation. As a consumer, it starts to feel like a brand is trying to trick me into a click.

Maybe "snow salt" was a very cheap keyword to bid on. But damaging a brand’s reputation is very expensive.

{ 0 comments }

Slate.com has a good read today: The Not-So-Fantastic Four: Why Yahoo!, eBay, Amazon, and AOL are Tanking.

The main issue of the article seems to be about the inability for four companies to diversify. I think there is more to it than that. After all, when it comes to failed attempts to diversify, Google has its share of challenges. Yet their stock price is sky high.

I think, simply, all the “new media” companies of the 90s (such as the big four listed in Slate), now have the same look & feel as all the “old media” companies we have known forever. We are no longer smitten with things that are “cool,” but want things that are useful.

{ 0 comments }

Lots of hubbub this week over some recent statistics on click fraud released by Outsell Inc., and reported in the San Francisco Chronicle.

“In today’s report, advertisers say that 14.6 percent of all clicks are bogus. Moreover, three-quarters of advertisers said they had been victims at least once.”

Playing devils advocate: if 15% of the clicks are bogus, then doesn’t that mean the other 85% are effective? Any campaign in any marketing channel that can show an 85% effective rate is a smart investment to make. Besides, the 15% statistic is only interesting if it was 11% last year—in other words, trending upwards, which there is no evidence that it is.

Search Engine Watch digs deeper into the report, questioning some of the methodology.

Obviously click fraud need to be addressed (and it is by Google, Yahoo and many others). But don’t fall for calls to end search marketing budgets. Nothing has been shown to match the efficient reach of search—paid or organic.

Technorati Tags: ,

{ 0 comments }

Today, Google Checkout opens for business. Google describes it as a, "a checkout process that makes online shopping faster, more convenient and more secure for Google users."

The last part of that sentence is the most important: "…for Google users." To be a merchant, a business has to also be an adwords advertiser.

If Microsoft did this now*, everyone would call it over-reaching. But Google has plenty of media love right now. Case in point: two weeks ago, Google released an online spreadsheet. It lacked any real features (read: it was crap). But the press gave it plenty of favorable ink.

John Battelle, who wrote "The Search", said this may be a breaking point for Google — few may trust Google this much to also be their wallet. I agree with him.

With Checkout, Google does have something going for it—more methods of secure buying are needed on the internet. But making merchants also have to be a part of adwords system will be a little too much, especially since there are already great, secure transaction tunnels that do not carry this sort of overhead.

This will be the Star Wars: Episode One of the payment world — lots of hype, little impact.

* Microsoft did give it a whirl with a product called MSN Wallet. It was shut down in March 2003.

Technorati Tags: , ,

{ 0 comments }